ContactJuggling.org

Half dance, half juggling, half mime, half magic....I'm a contact juggler, not a mathematician
It is currently 21 May 2013, 07:53




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 113 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2009, 19:22 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2008, 20:22
Posts: 16
Location: Toronto, Canada
Robbert wrote:
well, don't get me wrong.

but aren't we dancing because the rest is so f@@$$ difficult? and this it still looks flasy with the same old movefs


Learning to liquid took me longer than learning to contact juggle; I've put way more time into it weekly, started before contact and I'm nowhere NEAR good enough to make people go "whoaholyshit!" like I can with contact juggling...

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 20 Apr 2009, 02:15 
Offline

Joined: 23 Jun 2008, 06:35
Posts: 2129
Location: Nijmegen The Netherlands
Working on: Unraveling the unicorn mystery
DotOrg bonus points: 28114
that was just a joke. back than, both takes a huge amount of time to master. it is not that you just master a trick but you master a motion

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 20 Apr 2009, 03:34 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 07:33
Posts: 1520
Location: Hull, England
I had played around with trying to work on my movement and footwork for a long time working from my own initiative, and i found it very very difficult to make any progress (by comparison, i generally find my best breakthroughs in contact come from sitting by myself, and thinking carefully through what body motions are possible, and how to work on that with the ball). However, when I was able to get some good advice, and actually have someone stand there, analyse where i was going wrong, and give my tips and pointers, then I was able to make big leaps, and give me a basis to go away and learn on my own.

I'm not sure whether this is to do with the way Dance is learned by comparison to contact (it's very difficult to objectively assess your own footwork, without a wall of mirrors), or the quality of the teaching, or a little of both, but i definitely think i would still be struggling to understand even the basics of gliding, sliding and popping if I hadn't had someone to show me where to start.

_________________
even perfect health is terminal if left untreated indefinitely

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 20 Apr 2009, 04:39 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 29 Sep 2004, 06:58
Posts: 2232
Location: South England
Working on: Everything and Nothing
DotOrg bonus points: 51200
Transformer robot points: 3
Yup, good foundations make for big structures...

Mmmm... mixing Dance with ball...

It's going up a level. I found an upwards learning curve in my trough...

I think the problem has been that it's been a relatively new thing on the contact scene, and not so deeply explored. Because of this, it became very trial and error, with the same moves being attempted (or 'yoinked' ;) ) by everyone.

I think this is about to change, though. I found some rules. the building blocks of the style, as it were. it feels like it will now be a lot easier to develop my own style of Isolationism, so that I stand out more from the others, and not have the ball look superfluous to my dancing, nor my dancing look out of place with the contact. It took a while, but it's getting there!

_________________
Z = Z^2 + C
Do it slowlier, Okido?
Installer of Warp Drive Technology. Sending out Ripples and making Waves.
Chin high, chest puffed, we step right to it. The choice is; there is no choice but to pursue it.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 25 Apr 2009, 22:25 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2008, 14:35
Posts: 123
Location: Seattle
I didn't read all the thread, so forgive me if this was already addressed. People CJ for all various kinds of reason. Some of them see CJ more as a Juggling Performance (Examples may include Michale Mochen). Some contact juggle as a body movement performance (Examples may include dancing). Some CJ as a Mysticism Performance (Examples may include magical performances). I am sure there are many other reasons folks CJ that I have missed, but my point is this:

Are any of these reasons wrong or any less valid to the individual performance?

I wouldn't think so. Those who are pop lockers and combine CJ into their dance, good for them. They are appealing to a crowd in a specific way. I honestly enjoy watching it, but it's not something I do. And I can't see myself going much further than smoothing out very basic patterns and isos for my performances as it is not the main staple.

_________________
Life is a game that is meant to be played.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 26 Apr 2009, 12:37 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2004, 08:00
Posts: 2876
Location: Canada
DotOrg bonus points: 48982
Transformer robot points: 1
This thread is awesome. I remember way back when that first post was made; its seemed surprising at the time that anyone would actually be concerned about the tiny group of people back then that were exploring this territory; now it is pretty common.

Agreed with Ed, there is still much to explore. But mass respect to people like Matt Hennem, ElsieDee, Ed, Colin, Metra, Okotanpe, Komei Aoki and the others who are doing the research; the fusion is amazing.

_________________
www.ryanmellors.com
www.ministryofmanipulation.com
www.piryokopi.net

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2009, 16:13 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 02 Aug 2006, 00:41
Posts: 245
Location: Calgary
i thought i'd poke my head in and leave my opinion...

I believe it is your body language and motion that enhances peoples focus on your ball. This can include but is not limited to mime, dance, martial arts whatever...your movement around the ball if done correctly creates the 'sentient ball' effect that makes people so wowzers about CJ. Most people, myself included are more impressed by fluidity of motion and theatrics than sheer technique and calculated rolling.

CJ to me is a creative exploration of the sense of touch, of kinesthetics. Putting borders around a form of art saying it can only performed in a certain way is stifling the creative evolution of said art...thats wack man

_________________
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ +
+

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 May 2012, 19:10 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 24 May 2005, 04:00
Posts: 4378
Location: London
DotOrg bonus points: 99999
Transformer robot points: 3
Ed, Colin, come back - we miss you guys :wink:

Having already danced my nuts off tonight, this thread makes me wanna dance all the way home :D

I only re-read this thread because for some reason I had a mental block and couldn't remember Coleman's name, and I knew he'd posted in this thread. But 8 pages later I'm enjoying some serious nostalgia...

Consider me re inspired. Thanks, ncfiala :wink:

_________________
One Love, one heart
Let's get together and feel alright

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ All times are UTC - 5 hours ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Search for:
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Subsilver2 skin adapted by marco to resemble phpBB2 Aluminoid theme (by DewChugr) adapted by mot
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group